06/23/26 01:28:00
Printable Page
06/23 13:26 CDT NCAA panel approves new eligibility rules giving Division I
athletes 5 years to play 5 seasons
NCAA panel approves new eligibility rules giving Division I athletes 5 years to
play 5 seasons
By ERIC OLSON
AP Sports Writer
Eager to lessen the chaos of the transfer portal era, the NCAA approved a new
eligibility model for Division I athletes on Tuesday that will allow five
seasons of competition over a five-year period that begins with their full-time
enrollment or the academic year following their 19th birthday, whichever occurs
first.
The Division I Cabinet approved the change from the longstanding tenet of
college sports that gave athletes five years to complete four seasons of
competition with their eligibility clock starting at the time of enrollment,
regardless of age.
The move will all but eliminate waivers or resdhirt years for extended
eligibility except for religious missions, maternity leave or active-duty
military service. No longer will extensions be considered for athletes who are
injured.
The rules are set to take effect this fall. Division I includes more than 350
schools, some 200,000 athletes and, with football and basketball leading the
way, is by far the most lucrative of the three in the NCAA.
The five-in-five language also is included in Senate legislation intended to
address numerous concerns across college sports and comes after a wave of
lawsuits from athletes seeking to extend their college careers and ability to
earn money through revenue sharing and name, image and likeness deals. Still to
be seen is whether the new rules will withstand legal scrutiny alongside the
existing challenges.
Heisman Trophy runner-up and Vanderbilt quarterback Diego Pavia remains the
lead plaintiff in a lawsuit challenging an NCAA rule counting seasons spent at
junior colleges against players' Division I eligibility time. That case is
slated for trial in February.
"I wouldn't say that the rule change itself will slow lawsuits down," said Sam
Ehrlich, a Boise State assistant professor of legal studies in business and
management who tracks litigation against the NCAA.
Ehrlich said athletes very well could continue to petition courts for extended
eligibility based on antitrust arguments, but appellate courts recently have
delivered wins for the NCAA by overturning preliminary injunctions in several
cases.
The new eligibility model will affect all athletes who enroll in 2027-28.
Currently enrolled athletes with eligibility after the 2025-26 academic year,
and those who are incoming freshmen this fall, can apply the age-based model or
continue under previous eligibility rules.
For schools with current athletes who may be eligible for hardship waivers or
extensions of eligibility under current rules, the D-I Cabinet indicated the
deadline to submit requests to the NCAA is July 31. After that date, waivers
would no longer be available.
Attorney Mit Winter, who specializes in sports law, has called the five-year
proposal and age limit "a very sensible rule" in offering a "more black and
white" evaluation to player eligibility, particularly for schools navigating a
complicated waiver process determined on a case-by-case basis.
But with athletes still not being considered employees or having collective
bargaining available to establish agreed-upon standards, Winter said, legal
challenges are likely.
"It might be a little easier to defend than the current rules we have," Winter
said when the rule was proposed in April. "But when you just look at it from a
broad point of view, it's still essentially limiting how long someone can work
as a college athlete and be paid as a college athlete."
___
AP college sports: https://apnews.com/hub/college-sports
|